INCLUDE_DATA

Interesting, catchy title

A five minute drive, or - more commonly - a twelve minute bike ride from my house, Lake Michigan slices through the countryside and stretches west (on all but the clearest days) as far as the eye can see. The resulting shoreline draws tourists from all around the tristate area … but mostly from Chicago.

Families, windsurfers, and sun worshipers alike flock to packed beaches every weekend, enjoying the cohesive sand, freshwater, and ultraviolet radiation. Unknown to most, however, are the many parks, preserves, and sanctuaries a few miles south. The nearest of these - and the one that has consumed my weekends for about six months - is Grand Mere State Park.

In geologic time scales, Grand Mere is too young to seriously consider a newborn. It developed entirely within late human history.

The Great Lakes basins were carved by the receding Laurentide ice sheet beginning about 15,000 years before present. As the ice receded, it melted to fill the resulting troughs, and by 4000bp, the Great Lakes resembled their current configuration. (Interestingly enough, the entire area is still very young and dynamic. The land around the Great Lakes is still rebounding after the departure of the ice sheets, rising about 7.5 cm / century.)

The shoreline of western Michigan was - as it still is - highly irregular, with many jutting features and recesses. One such bay was at the present-day location of Grand Mere. Due to blowing sand from the beaches, longshore currents, and other possible factors, a sand bar began stretching across the bay, eventually fully enclosing the area and breaking the surface of the water. An ecological experiment, with as close to laboratory isolation as exists in the field, was beginning.

grand-mere-1-export

The land bridge shielded the inland lake from Lake Michigan, and vegetation and sand began to fill the basin, eventually creating an area of solid sand dunes with five small lakes.

grand-mere-2-export

This whole process created essentially a blank ecological palette, making Grand Mere a unique, ongoing experiment in ecological succession. Aquatically, development came through the process of eutrophication. As organisms established themselves in the sandy floors and shores of the inland lakes, they began cultivating proper soil and sediment. Over time, this and sand from the dunes accumulate, increasing the habitable area for other aquatic life while shrinking and shallowing the body of water.

Through this process, two of the lakes filled in and are now low-lying forested areas. The remaining three lakes are constantly becoming shallower and more densely populated. Around the edges, they blur with marshlands, and heavy brush and lily pads encroach on the water.

dsc_6464

On land, Grand Mere is a perfect case study in ecological succession. One can walk from sand through brush to young growth forests, tracing time and ecosystems. The pioneer organism is the lowly Marram Grass.

dsc_5862

This hardy, knee-height grass takes root in lose sand. It covers many of the dunes, forming a surface mesh which prevents erosion. The grass synthesizes various organic substances, and through the course of its life and death, it deposits nutrients into the ground. Slowly, the barren sand becomes a workable soil, hospitable to other organisms. Moving up the ladder of succession, you see shrubs and flowers, then small trees, and finally dense forests.

Grand Mere also contains a wide variety of microclimates, under the shelter of dunes or foliage. For instance, the south side of the park apparently hosts a well-developed hemlock forest, something usually seen much further north in colder climates. I haven’t been able to explore said forest, as the south side is extremely difficult to penetrate. I would love to explore it in greater depth, relying on GPS by necessity, but at this time of year the mosquitoes and other biting insects are far too pervasive.

dsc_7702

Grand Mere also hosts some other species unusual to the area. It has significant quantities of prickly pear cacti, and some of these impostor plants pretending to be cacti. They still look quite sullen in the snow.

dsc_5553

But, despite all the lovely plants and whatnot, my favorite part of Grand Mere is undoubtedly the beach. Now, it doesn’t look like this year round. In fact, it spends the majority of the year as yet another unremarkable beach, with sand and waves and whatnot, but every December the bitter cold and wind finally overpower the massive latent heat of Lake Michigan and ice begins forming.

Now, ice on Lake Michigan is completely unlike ice on a small pond or ice in the ocean. It is a chaotic series of equilibriums, with violent coups. The water around the shore is calm enough for uniform sheets of ice to form, but shifting winds and storms can bring in barrages of icebergs, floes, or other random objects, pulverizing whatever peaceful ice collection existed, then refreezing into a further jumbled mess.

dsc_6533

My favorite time to visit is from February to March, when the ice begins melting. All the ice on the west and south coasts of the lake go first, and they’re swept all around, making for a glorious destruction derby as they collide with the thinning ice at Grand Mere.

It’s a fantastic time to walk around and take pictures, what with collapsing ice shelves and dripping icicles and the like. By that time of the year, the ice extends out for several hundred feet in a massive jumble of melded ice floes, cliffs, icebergs, meltwater streams, and caverns, and the water underneath is actually far deeper than it seems. What appears to still be solid sand is in fact merely sand embedded in a floating ice platform, and it’s impossible to tell what is solid, foot thick ice and what is about to yield all on its own, at least until you’re standing somewhere you thought safe and start hearing the ice fracturing all around you. That happens with disturbing regularity.

And, despite it all, I only fell in once.

dsc_6549

Goals

shower-hardcore-640

This made the rounds on the internet a few days ago. For the last three days, I’ve gotten up in the morning and showered using option number two. I need every bit of help waking up I can get.

On the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11

I’m hardly the first to inform anyone: forty years ago, Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin ScD ‘63 stepped onto the surface of the moon, snatching the top prize in the Space Raceand placing the astronaut firmly ahead of the classic fireman as the dream occupation of every child. It was all over the mainstream media and even made it onto the MIT Admissions blog.

google-trends

However - with no offense to Matt McGann - my favorite coverage of the anniversary is the Boston Globe’s feature, Remembering Apollo 11, from the Big Picture section (a perpetually stunning photojournalism section, well worth frequenting). It shows all the iconic pictures from the mission - the footprint, the Earthrise, the “visor” shot, etc. - but also many I had never seen before, especially pictures of the crew not walking around on the lunar surface.

Some things I found interesting:

  • In picture 39, President Nixon greets the returned astronauts through a window on a heavily reinforced silver capsule, apparently using a microphone to transmit through the thick glass.

    Surprisingly to me, the parades and other festivities welcoming the astronauts home didn’t begin just after splashdown. Instead, the astronauts were extracted onto the USS Hornet, hosed down with chemicals, and locked into a tricked out Airstream trailer, complete with a negative pressure containment system and oodles of air filters, which was the first stop in a 21-day quarantine, ending tomorrow, 40 years back. The possibility of harmful pathogens existing on the moon was seen as unlikely, but worth safeguarding against.

  • Many of the pictures from the surface of the moon are covered in thin “+” marks.

    This one took some research. As it turns out, the primary camera used on the surface was a modified Hasselblad, termed the “Lunar Surface Data Camera.” In order to make accurate measurements of photographed objects, a reference was necessary to control for stretching and shrinking in the film. The camera was fitted with a Reseau Plate, a sheet of glass placed just in front of the film which had etched crosses whose positions were known to great precision.

    Of course, knowing precise coordinates on the film is useless if the image striking the film is distorted, so NASA worked with lens designers at Zeiss to create a 60mm prime with obscenely low distortion. It also had to be designed to operate in a vacuum, requiring the lens to forgo conventional lubricants.

    The cameras performed admirably, but due to weight constraints, they were discarded on the surface of the moon. Only the film canisters were brought back. So, if you’re visiting, you can help yourself ot any of the 12 bodies and lenses presumably sitting in working order.

  • Oddly enough, those cameras haven’t been disturbed for decades. This is the most shocking of any juicy tidbit: we haven’t returned to the moon since the conclusion of the Apollo program.

    I believe that it’s not merely my Course 16 bias that makes this shameful. Humanity reached a high water mark with the moon landings, for the first time leaving the little gravity well we call “Earth” and taking the first step towards making our species more than carbon critters marooned on a rock.

    However, since the end of the Apollo program, we’ve had no means of reaching the moon. The achievements from 40 years ago couldn’t be replicated today. With the Space Shuttle, we’ve been putting toys up into Low-Earth Orbit for decades, and next year the shuttle will retire and we won’t even be able launch humans into orbit. That’s just sad.

New stuff

Being an unabashed consumer (in the economic and biological senses), receiving new stuff makes for an exciting day - exciting enough to make me wonder if George Carlin had it right with the meaning of life (relatively clean for Carlin, and hilarious):

So, what am I excited about? First, I got my notebook for class this fall.

Ok, intentionally misleading. I received my notebook computer and a big stack of laboratory notebooks for taking notes this fall. The former is a Lenovo Thinkpad W500 (a complete tank), and the latter are the same indestructible notebooks I’ve been spilling foodstuffs on for months, abuse for which they look none the worse.

Both of these are quite exciting, but even better is what I found on the MIT Admissions Blogs, this year’s blogger application. I’ve mentioned my aspirations of bloggership before, and I’ll be writing various responses to questions from the application and posting them here over the course of the next two weeks.

Additionally, I’m going to try to dig out a few of the pieces sitting in my draft box and get them in publishable condition. The delay on a few of them (Apollo 11, for instance …) is quite shameful, but hopefully I’ll have more time for blogging, seeing as just yesterday I finally accepted that I’m not going to finish the psets for the 18.03 (differential equations) Advanced Standing Exam. I’ll be using my newfound time to work through my entry backlog.

Of course, merely talking about blogging makes for a rather vacuous entry, but seeing as it’s too late to fix that problem, I’ll just end with my two favorite internet discoveries from the last few weeks.

First, an incredibly beautiful and flat-out wrong mashup of Nirvana and Rick Astley:

And second, the best procrastination tool I’ve encountered recently, “Red Remover,” a somewhat physics-based block game with a wonderful amount of tricky problem solving. I’d rather not mention how far I’ve gotten…

Calling off the hearses

Yesterday, after about 48 hours of drying, I was quite confident there was no more moisture left in my terribly misfortunate camera. I had waited two days - longer than I really thought necessary - because I knew that pushing current through the delicate circuits while still wet would in all likelihood kill it dead.

But, reason and impatience finally overcame apprehension, so I grimaced a little, loaded a battery, and flipped the dial to on. The screen lit up in the dark gray color scheme I use, sort of a utilitarian emo look, but I wasn’t convinced. Surely there were more sinister problems lurking out of view. I started flipping through dials, taking test shots, checking focus, removing the lens and watching the mirror actuate, growing increasingly suspicious: I couldn’t find anything malfunctioning.

After a day of shooting, I can say with confidence that absolutely no functions of the camera were affected by the accident. This is truly astounding. Really, look at what that slice of space-time looked like:

wave-camera

The camera was fully submerged without any sort of underwater housing or protection. This still amazes me. I use a Nikon D40, which unlike professional cameras, it lacks the slightest bit of weather sealing. All of the buttons and dials are surrounded by air gaps, not O-rings (which, as a SCUBA diver, I believe to be some of the most incredible - and incredibly simple - objects ever created), and the lens has no seal to prevent water from leeching in. Props to Nikon - I’m just astounded and thrilled to have a not destroyed camera.

Also, I finally finished playing with Hugin, an open source panorama stitching program, which I believe to be the best in existence, besting even Photoshop CS4. I love when open source software pwns. Here’s the result, about 210 degrees of a stormy Lake Michigan. It’s well worth opening the large version. The actual image is about 9200 pixels across.

grand-mere-panorama-640

A pre-mortem eulogy, Cajun-style

Friends and loved ones, we gather here to recognize the probable demise of something very dear: my Nikon D40. While the circumstances are undoubtedly tragic, a jazz funeral seems more fitting given the bang it went out with.

Last evening, sunset neared, and it was overcast and dreary, but interestingly enough the sky actually seemed brighter to the west. I surmised there might be scattered clouds over Lake Michigan, conditions which can look very interesting with the golden sunset light illuminating clouds from below. So, I headed towards the Lake, biking in spite of the threatening showers.

dsc_3564

The sunset was shaping up to be a gorgeous one.

dsc_3602

Additionally, the clouds were a bit cumulus, so they weren’t as flat and dull as normal overcast. They darkened the sky enough that it balanced well with the ground, so it was an excellent time for picture taking.

dsc_3699

This isn’t a white balance error. After the Sun set, a wonderful purple hue set in.

dsc_3705

Soon, a bit of a storm began brewing. The waves picked up in intensity. As I was shooting near the sand and rocks, a bit of surge from the waves crawled further up the beach. I got my shoes and jeans soaked, but kept the camera clear by watching what was going on.

dsc_3742

This is the last picture my camera took, and I believe it’s the very wave that snuck up on me. As I held the camera an inch or two above water level, I watched for oncoming waves and aligned the camera so the framing was right and things were mostly level. Unfortunately, I was concentrating at the moment more on the latter two, and when the crest of the wave arrived, I was still holding the camera down by the water surface. My Nikon sliced right through the wave, ending up momentarily submerged.

I instinctively ejected the battery and started shaking water out of the battery and connection port areas. Unfortunately, neither this camera nor lens are “weather sealed,” so they’re completely without O-rings or other wonderful and waterproof things.

I headed back home then, just as rain and lightning moved. Interestingly enough, this follows a long pattern of me being unable through various misfortunes to catch lightning on film (or CCD, as it were). At home, I wiped the camera down with something better than my t-shirt, the best I had at the beach. I’ve managed to resist inserting the battery or turning it on, knowing that could fry still-wet circuitry.

And, while the introduction sounded a tad maudlin, I believe there is hope left. Most parts seem dry right now, and after perhaps 24 hours, it may be time for a test. While this camera is not made for incidents like this, I’ve been impressed with Nikon’s durability before. A death at the tender age of seven months would cast a bit of a tragic pall on the picture series I’m running (that is, working on, sometime. Maybe). Perhaps in 24 hours it will have dried sufficiently to test.

The last picture I have to post, a panorama of the sunset, needs some more time to process. I’ll post it here sometime hopefully.

Small but distinctly non-zero blurb of stuff

  • Freshman Essay Evaluation: passed (yay!), leading to
  • HASS-D Lottery: due very soon. I have yet to start picking classes.
  • The Clapper: I have one. Hopefully I’ll write about it soon.
  • The lightning radius of death entry: I just finished, after about two months in progress. Check it out.
  • 18.03 Advanced Standing Exam psets: ~30 left to do. Waaaay too many.
  • Laptop: ordered. Lenovo Thinkpad W500. I’ll probably write about it when I receive it, and I might even tell how I saved $200 by upgrading the processor (assuming nothing goes catastrophically wrong with my order).
  • The Cavaliers Drum and Bugle Corps: after missing their performance due to the weather at Naperville, I discovered they were rehearsing a little under an hour away at Grandville High School. I watched most of their rehearsal, but had to return home for fireworks (July Third fireworks, no less) before the big brass piece, but it was still enjoyable.

dsc_3110

During the middle of the song, I saw a rather punkish-looking young fellow with a raised hoodie loitering around in the pit. He was drinking from a green beer bottle, so I assumed he was a percussion technician, and an unusually chill one at that. As it were, this section of the percussion feature includes blown bottle noises, and there was no consumption of alcohol going on (to my knowledge). Some of the bottles were, however, tuned using a mystery liquid.

Lightning’s radius of lethality

Before we begin, intuition check: if you’re swimming in the water and lightning strikes nearby, is it better to be in freshwater or saltwater? No cheating.

Some weeks ago, I found myself sitting in a Dairy Queen with a pen, a notebook, and some imspiration - it was physics time. Note: several months have actually passed since I wrote that sentence. However, I’m skipping the Harry Potter premiere and am determined to finally finish this.

I’ve wondered since my childhood if lightning actually posed a serious threat to swimmers. I spent enough time in the water to grow accustomed to blaring whistles and lifeguards ordering everyone out of the water every time a distant thundercrack sounded, but I had my doubts: if electricity could travel for miles through water to electrocute innocent beach-goers, why were there never news stories of swimmers tragically zapped by bolts of lightning from beyond their sight? Why were there not scores of dead fish washed up on the shores after every thunderstorm?

Lacking the means to test this experimentally, I let the uncertainty rest as an hazy malease in the back of my mind for many years.  I didn’t make any progress or even think of the problem again until a few weeks ago, sitting in that Dairy Queen. A few hours of scribbling, calculating, generalizing, and most of all researching actual values for constants later, I’m satisfied with the result. But, before I begin, you should understand this:

WARNING
I am not a physicist. I am not an electrician. Even if I were, it would not be a good idea to attempt to validate this. I repeat: I am a high school student. Do not go swimming in thunderstorms on my advice. Do not go swimming in thunderstorms ever. That is STUPID.

lightningnotebook

So, on to the physics. I decided to try out my new Wacom tablet for this.

First, assume a lightning bolt induces a constant current I into the water. The electrons flow in a uniform hemispherical distribution. As the electrons travel outwards, the current density J at radius R can be expressed using the current I and the surface area of the hemisphere.

lightningcalculations1

During the middle of the strike, when current is assumed to be uniform, it is reasonable to assume that inductive effects are negligible, so current is proportional to voltage and current density is proportional to electric field. The proportionality constant is conductivity, in siemens per meter, sigma.

Substituting, we find the strength of the electric field at radius R in terms of I and conductivity.

lightningcalculations2

Ultimately, we are interested in the worst-case voltage a swimmer could be subjected to at a given distance r from the strike. So, we integrate electric field over a distance l, where l is the length in meters of the swimmers armspan. We assume his arms are fully outstretched in line with the strike, as that represents the worst case scenario. We integrate with respect to R using the swimmer’s distance r as the midpoint of the integral to jive with the intuition of measuring to the swimmer’s body and to simplify the resulting antiderivative. Finally, solve for r.

My handwriting starts to shrink here. I’m fairly certain it’s involuntary.

lightningcalculations3

Equation (3) shows what the minimum radius is to experience a voltage V given a certain conductivity, length l, and current I from the lightning. We wish to know what the minimum radius is to be lethal to the person, so we must express this in human terms.

An important concept here is how electricity kills. It does not matter what voltage one is subjected to (being shocked with thousands of volts of static electricity is harmless), but on the current through one’s body, and through which parts. To be lethal, one must experience a current of approximately 100 mA across the chest cavity. This lethal current I_L depends on the resistance R (recycled variable) of the person and the voltage V across his fingertips.

lightningcalculations4

This equation shows the minimum lethal radius for this worst-case scenario. For convenience, it can be approximated by removing the l^2/4 term, as it will contribute little to any reasonably large radius and reasonably sized swimmer. Here, we see that increasing the conductivity actually require the lightning strike to be closer to induce death. It’s more dangerous to be in freshwater than saltwater.
lightningcalculations5

Finally, we can plug in some variables. Of course, the length, lightning current, and especially conductivity vary considerably, but some reasonable assumptions allow some rough results. I assume a slightly taller than average swimmer with an armspan of two meters. I_L is the commonly accepted 100mA (.1 A). Conductivity depends on a whole host of factors, including depth, temperature, and salinity, but a fair reference value is 5.3 S/m. For large freshwater bodies, such as my neighbor Lake Michigan, median conductivity is about 29.5 mS/m.

It’s significantly more difficult to pin down a value for the resistance of a human from fingertip to opposite fingertip. The internal resistance of a human is exceedingly low, around 100 ohms, because of all the electrolytes in blood. However, skin greatly raises the resistance. For dry skin, the figure is about 1-2 mega ohms, but the figures I found for wet skin varied over several orders of magnitude, and I was unable to find any reference which distinguished between wet from fresh or salt water. So, I took a much-needed break from calculation and performed a small experiment.

dsc_2276

Very simple, I got two vessels, filled them with water, held the probes from a multimeter in my hands, and set them in the baths. The only current path was through my arms. I waited for a little over 5 minutes to allow water to infiltrate my skin and provide the best conduction path possible to the bloodstream. I then repeated the experiment using salt baths (matching salinity by taste and memory, definite error source). I used “sea salt” from one of those grinders, so perhaps this helped the authenticity. When I was done, my fingers were all wrinkled and pruney, so it was a success. My observed resistances were 51.5 kilo ohms for freshwater and 16.6 kilo ohms for saltwater.

And, the grand table:

Average Bolt (30 KA) Large Bolt (120 KA) Positive Bolt (300 KA)
Fresh Water 8.0m 16m 25m
Salt Water 1.4m 2.3m 3.4m

Figures are given for fresh water and for different sized lightning strikes. The largest listed is positive lightning, an uncommon type of bolt where electrons actually leap from the ground to the clouds which is significantly more powerful than a normal discharge.

These figures seem encouraging for surviving thunderstorms in the water, but be aware that some values for the resistance of a wet human are as low as 1100 ohms, which extends the maximum killing radius to 172 meters in freshwater. Regardless, it is a bad idea to swim anywhere during a thunderstorm.

If you’re still having a tough time accepting that conductive salt water is safer, remember that the same amount of electricity has to flow through the water no matter what the resistance. The more resistive the water, the greater the voltage difference from one point to another for that current (think V=I*R).

Ten Thousand Pictures, Rainout at DCI: Naperville

Last weekend, I drove down to Naperville, IL to watch a drum corps competition. (If you’re confused and unawares, drum corps are elite college-age marching bands consisting of 150 brass, percussion, and color guard members. They compete all summer and possess an indescribable level of awesomeness. By definition, I can’t explain it, and neither can this video, but it tries.)

The weather forecast included a chance of thunderstorms - 30% in the morning, but rising to 80% when I left that evening. Regardless, the corps arrived and carried on as usual, unloading semi trailers and buses and donning uniforms. As the first ensembles began performing, I headed out to the buses to meet up with a friend in Phantom Regiment (2008 World Champions, woot!). They were finishing their stretching as the storm front moved overhead.

dsc_2853

They managed to finish their warmup and were about to head to the stadium when an event official arrived and ordered all the corps back to their buses. The rain swept in within minutes. I headed back to the field. Officials had cleared the stands and were herding fans under cover. I bypassed the men with bullhorns and hid around a corner to watch the storm develop. Under the stormclouds, the sun set, creating a rather eerie glow behind the lightning.

dsc_2885

This shot almost makes up for not being able to watch any corps perform. Well, …, it’s better than nothing. But, it reminds me of something I have meant to do for months. Months ago, at CPW, the shutter actuation counter on my camera passed 10000. Being the sort of person who adores highly composite numbers and despises primes and numbers that pretend to be prime (I’m looking at you, 51), I appreciated the roundness of 10000, and I thought it was a decent milestone after 4.5 months to look back at some of my favorite pictures. Number 10000 itself isn’t one of those.

dsc_9287

This picture is from a panorama series of the sunrise on Sunday morning over Boston. I hadn’t slept. However, I probably didn’t include that picture, as it’s pretty blurry.

dsc_9314-dsc_9325-rectx640

If you’re hip with your number theory, you might have noticed I pulled a fast one on you up there. Ten thousand is not a highly composite number. However, 10080 is. However, there’s an entire region surrounding that number which is completely devoid of pictures. I was probably testing out some camera setting and deleted the junk pictures. However, I like this one, and 10043 is as close as it gets.

dsc_9330

The wonderful thing about CPW is being able to to bask in prefroshly immunity. This is from the same sunrise, somewhere on top of campus. I honestly don’t remember where.

So, 4:16am is about the cutoff for my brain’s ability to function, and this is enough pictures for a first part. I plan to continue this series, either starting at the beginning or working back from 10000. More likely, pseudorandomly.

Using MIT Athena Remotely, Part 2: Zephyr and Barnowl

With the preliminaries of logging into Athena taken care of, we can move on to Zephyr itself.

Note: if you are unsure of how to log into Athena, refer back to part one for an introduction.

Zephyr

Zephyr is Athena’s messaging system. Conventional wisdom says that Zephyr is difficult to explain - it’s better experienced, but for now all you need to know is that it’s a feature-rich instant messaging system used at MIT.

The most basic way to use Zephyr is to not send messages at all. When you log in to an Athena terminal, you’ll see any messages sent to you automatically in a box, but that’s barely scraping the surface of what Zephyr can do. Another option is using the “zwrite” and other commands where you log in using Linerva, but this is awkward. Instead, I’ll cover a program named Barnowl, which handles (virtually) all of Zephyr’s features and can update in real time, making it useful for instant messaging.

Barnowl

Barnowl is a student-developed zephyr client derived from the antiquated Owl client.  It handles most all of Zephyr’s functions and keeps everything centralized.

To start Barnowl, type the command “barnowl” at the Athena command line (see part one for using Linerva). If you’ve never set up Barnowl before, you’ll receive an error message. You’ll need to install Barnowl first.

This is easy to accomplish, simply type “add barnowl”. However, you’ll want Barnowl to be installed every time you start a new Athena session, so we’ll create an environment file, which will run every time you log in. Using nano, as in part 1, create a file named “.bash_environment” (starting with a period - this is common for system files) in your main Athena directory. In it, type “add barnowl”. The commands in this file will be executed every time you log in.

So now, either log out and back in to run .bash_environment or type “add barnowl” and proceed. From here, you can start Barnowl using its command, “barnowl”. You’ll see Barnowl’s welcome screen. From here, there are oodles of things you could do, but let’s start at the basics.

To receive messages in Zephyr, you must subscribe to “classes” where discussion is taking place. These classes can be anything, from clubs, to the wide-ranging “help,” to personal classes. Within classes, there are instances, where lines of discussion can remain grouped together. To start off, you’ll want to subscribe to chat for your class.

To enter a command, first open the Barnowl command prompt by typing a colon (”:”, using Shift). Then, you may type your instructions. Use the “subscribe” command in the form “subscribe [class] [instance] [recipient]“. So, if you were Matt McGann and wanted to subscribe to any messages in the Class of ‘00 class, you would type “subscribe 2000 * *”. An asterisk acts as a wildcard, so it matches any instance and any recipient.

Once you’re subscribed to your class’s class, you may see messages appearing on the screen if there’s an active discussion. To write to the class, type “:zwrite -c CLASSNAME”, where “CLASSNAME” is the class you are writing to. A writing area will appear, where you can type your message. To send it, enter a line containing only a period and press enter. Alternatively, press Ctrl+D. In a discussion, you can scroll up and down through comments using the arrow keys and simply press ‘r’ to reply to a message, saving the hassle of the zwrite command.

There are many other classes you can subscribe to. A popular one is “help”, where questions are posed ranging over all topics. The “message” class has several instances which you might find interesting. Additionally, the class named after each Athena user is considered reserved by social custom for whatever the user wants to use it for. You should subscribe to your personal class, and it’s typical for friends to subscribe to each others classes (note: subscription is a bit more personal than Facebook friendships - it’s a bit creepy to subscribe to someone who you’ve never met or talked with). Personal classes are often used for Twitter-like microblogging, including associated discussion.

This brings me to an important point. Zephyr is different from many instant messaging systems like AIM in several ways. First, exemplified by the period method for sending a message, Zephyr tends to be a more thoughtful messaging system than most. Messages are usually short paragraphs, or at least full sentences, utilizing capitalization, punctuation, spelling, and grammar. You will be looked down upon if you speak like a preteen girl in a text message. Note, however, that the prefrosh class is currently linked directly to AIM, so it has a distinctly “chat room” atmosphere, but if you venture outside of this class, be mindful of the expectations of Zephyr messaging.

There’s tons more to write about concerning Zephyr, but this is should get you started. I’ll write at least one more part, which will explain how to use GNU Screen to stay logged in to Barnowl perpetually, as is typical and extremely useful. This part, however, is still in a rough draft stage. There are undoubtedly many corrections and additions that should be made. Direct any questions to namu at mit dot edu.

If you want to dig further into some of Zephyr’s and Barnowl’s features, these are good places to start:

An excellent introductory guide to Zephyr, by SIPB
A much more comprehensive guide, also by SIPB
A getting started guide for Barnowl